"If a word in the dictionary were misspelled,how would we know?"-Stephen Wright

Another Benghazi report – the truth still remains elusive

Posted by 5etester on April 23, 2014

Yet another report is out rehashing what we’ve known about Benghazi for what seems like years now – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

There really isn’t anything relevant in this report. It’s all been released elsewhere and vetted as much as possible. The same set of issues also seem to arise from these reports. First, they don’t delve into why we toppled Gaddafi as the reasoning is always that it’s outside the scope of the report.

Second is the conclusion that the attacks were a failed kidnapping attempt. This is always gleaned from “inside sources”. This report is no different.

A senior FBI source, Lyons said Tuesday, ‘told me that was the plan.

Kidnapping? Maybe. But one has to ask why the pre-planned attack on the CIA annex hours later? The usage of mortars tells us the attack was coordinated and pre-planned. What does that have to do with a kidnapping? And if kidnapping Stevens was the entire basis for the attacks, why wouldn’t they have simply taken him in his motorcade so that any defense systems in place at the compound wouldn’t come into play?

This report doesn’t answer any of these questions or the many more that don’t align with the accepted narratives. Nobody wants to name names. These reports will highlight the fact that Boehner is blocking a select committee from investigating Benghazi. True. The GOP has much to lose as well if the true Benghazi story comes to light.

The takeaway here is to keep looking as the truth has yet to come to light.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The real reason China had Russia’s back in Crimea

Posted by 5etester on April 22, 2014

E-N-E-R-G-Y. I hate to sound like the climate change fanatics and say the debate is over but when it comes to natural resources, it is. It rules the geo-political decisions of the world’s leading powers.

China intends to invest in massive projects in Crimea less than a month after the former Ukrainian province was annexed by the Russian Federation.

Vladimir Chizhov, Russia’s ambassador to the European Union, said Russia is partnering with China in two major Crimean projects: the “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline and a 25 meter deep Crimean deep water port. These projects will continue despite the ongoing crisis in the Ukraine, Chizhov said.

Chizhov described the “Power of Siberia” gas pipeline as a mega-project that will pump 60 billion cubic meters of gas annually from the Kovykta and Tchayandinskoe gas fields to Russia’s far east, where a branch line will deliver 38 billion cubic meters a year to China.

Read more – http://www.chinatopix.com/articles/1814/20140417/china-prepares-massive-investments-crimea.htm

And do you want to know why dingy Harry Reid is so ticked off at all the “domestic terrorists” in the Nevada Bundy ranch debacle? The almighty buck.

And in a direct snub of the Americans, China will abandon a planned $5 billion solar power plant in Nevada and invest the money in Crimea, instead.

If you believe the BLM-Bundy standoff had anything to do with the desert tortoise or grazing cattle fees, then you’re completely missing the bigger picture. Reid would gladly sell out the sovereignty of his state’s citizens for some good ole’ greenbacks.

Strange bedfellows is the norm when it comes to the global war for natural resources. China will partner with whomever fits the bill when a deal needs to be made.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Government in action – how will we survive without them?

Posted by 5etester on April 18, 2014

So this is not an over-reaction?

One Man’s Pee Pushes Portland To Flush 38 Million Gallons Of Water

Though they concede it’s unlikely the public was endangered, officials in Portland, Ore., have decided to drain 38 million gallons of water from a reservoir after a young man was observed urinating into it on Wednesday

One commenter asked if we should drain this reservoir every time wildlife urinates in it.

I have a related question. Refer to the picture below.


Should this farmer plow under his corn crop?

Or this one.


Should we immediately commence clear-cutting and controlled wildfires to eradicate this onerous threat?

The stupidity of the left never ceases to amaze.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Sinister new al-Qaeda threat uncovered

Posted by 5etester on April 18, 2014

*Putting the nation on alert*
*highly credible terrorist threat*
*FBI announced today that it has uncovered a plot by members of al-Qaeda*

Yikes! What could this new threat against we infidels be?

FBI Uncovers Al-Qaeda Plot To Just Sit Back And Enjoy Collapse Of United States

Multiple intelligence agencies confirmed that the militant Islamist organization and its numerous affiliates intend to carry out a massive, coordinated plan to stand aside and watch America’s increasingly rapid decline, with terrorist operatives across the globe reportedly mobilizing to take it easy, relax, and savor the spectacle as it unfolds

Yes, once again we can count on The Onion to bring it to us straight – http://www.theonion.com/articles/fbi-uncovers-alqaeda-plot-to-just-sit-back-and-enj,35788/

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

New York to create thousands of new felons at midnight

Posted by 5etester on April 15, 2014

This year April 15 is more than the tax deadline for an estimated one million New York State residents. It’s also the deadline to register “assault weapons” and “high-capacity” magazines. If they don’t, they’ll begin living outside the law. A lot of them have decided to do just that. They’ve decided to practice civil disobedience even though failure to register an “assault weapon” by the deadline is punishable as a “class A misdemeanor,” which means a maximum sentence of one year in prison. Read more – http://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2014/04/13/as-many-as-one-million-armed-new-yorkers-are-about-to-break-the-law/

It was just over a month ago when Connecticut did the same – http://spellchek.wordpress.com/2014/03/11/u-s-state-increases-amount-of-felons-over-1800-with-the-stroke-of-a-pen/

Too bad these ‘assault weapons’ bans won’t do a thing to change the outcome of the high profile incidents of violence we’ve been witnessing. The knives used in a school or The Jewish Community Center shootings or The Fort Hood shootings.

They also won’t stop the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from wielding them in order to forcibly remove a rancher’s cattle.

Unfortunately, banning these so-called assault weapons are all about political correctness period. Backers can’t even correctly identify an assault weapon. Take the illustrious AR-15 for example. The poster child of the anti-gun crowd.

Did you know the AR in AR-15 doesn’t stand for assault rifle? Or automatic rifle? It stands for ArmaLite, the company that invented it back in the 1950′s.

Did you know the original AR-5 was created for the United States Air Force as a SURVIVAL weapon?

You can read all about the history of ArmaLite and the AR line of rifles here – http://www.armalite.com/images/Library/History.pdf

Will New York step up to the plate and incarcerate their newfound flock of felons at the stroke of midnight? After all, it is the law and merely possessing even just a magazine for a banned rifle will constitute a crime. Law enforcement should be expected to enforce this law just as any other. Will we see more of the Bundy-BLM style showdowns in the future as felonious New Yorkers are rounded up?

What’s more frightening than an owner of an AR-15? How about this at your front door?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Stevie Nicks & Tom Petty?

Posted by 5etester on April 12, 2014

Apparently, Tom Petty wasn’t available so Jimmy Fallon stepped in like a trooper!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Federal debt $106k per worker? Spread the word on this solution

Posted by 5etester on April 11, 2014

Harvard study: Your share of the federal debt is $106,000

American workers would have to cough up a one-time “debt reduction fee” of $106,000 to pay off the nation’s debt that has grown 58 percent under President Obama, according to Harvard University’s Institute of Politics annual report on the USA.

What’s the best thing we could do with this knowledge? How about making sure our youth understand the magnitude of the problems confronting them? How about handing out a bill to each student graduating high school detailing their portion of the federal debt burden due to irresponsible government?

Do you think it may get their attention? Do you think it may inspire them to get educated about the severity of the problem and their responsibility to solve it?

We have an incredible amount of money spent on lobbying and political ads in this country. Perhaps some of it could be redirected to simply printing out some pamphlets to pass out at each and every graduation this year, and each year after, to insure our youth realize the problem is theirs like it or not and that they will be the ones to solve it.

If you like this idea, then spread the word.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Is a 6 hour workday in the cards? President Obama must be smiling

Posted by 5etester on April 9, 2014

Is Sweden trying to leapfrog us? The democrats just can’t get enough of their part-time paradise as Obamacare has shown us. They always seem to be looking for new ways to diminish our economic output in America, and no doubt this attempt to do likewise by Sweden must have them salivating with jealousy.


Municipal staff in Gothenburg will act as guinea pigs in a proposed push for six-hour workdays with full pay, with hopes that it will cut down on sick leave, boost efficiency, and ultimately save Sweden money

I’ve been trying to follow the logic here. The claim is that efficiency suffers with an 8 hour workday. Reducing it to 6 is the cure?

Efficiency is not the same thing as productivity. For example, let’s say you produce 100 widgets per day as do I. However, it takes you 12 hours to do it while I only take 8. Even though our productivity is the same as measured on a daily basis, I am much more efficient by requiring 33% less time to complete the task.

If the Swedes are right and efficiency suffers with a longer workday, would it not make sense that the reduction in efficiency occurs in the later hours of one’s shift as they tire out? In other words, efficiency rates would be the same through the first 6 hours of an 8 hour shift as that of just a 6 hour shift. So productivity and total output will decline with a shorter workday, right?

Or are they saying that faced with the knowledge that you must work a long 8 hour day, your efficiency rate drops immediately in hour one simply due to mental fatigue? In other words, if I know I’m working a shorter day, my mental frame of mind is better and thus I work harder and become more efficient all day long.

Certainly, a leftist economics professor somewhere can produce a formula that shows efficiency increases when the workday decreases while maintaining productivity. Instead of naming it Pi, we’ll name it Pi in the sky! The fact is that for productivity to remain constant while the workday decreases, efficiency must naturally increase. However, the equation leaves out a most important factor tied to productivity. Compensation.

The Swedes have taken that out of the equation by promising equal pay for less hours. So why would the worker work harder to make up the difference? Is it not related to workday length at all, rather a question of compensation? Certainly we all know the type of worker who consciously makes a pre-determination that they are only giving their employer an amount of effort equal to their compensation.

Could the key to incentivizing efficiency be a merit based system? More efficiency leads to greater productivity which leads to greater compensation. Ah, now we’ve gotten to the heart of the matter. Rather than provide a system in which greater effort is rewarded, the approach is to dis-incentivize workers by providing equal compensation for less productivity.

Is the crux of the issue the fact that capitalists recognize human nature better than their socialist based counterparts? America’s welfare based programs follow this same logic of appealing to the human trait of taking the path of least resistance. When the roadblocks to success appear too daunting, people generally will fall back to the safe play of just taking what they can get. A lowered standard of living is generally preferable to no standard of living. If climbing above the ‘lower class’ requires personal sacrifice and forsaking the government gravy train, people will take the easier path.

Mats Pilhem, Left Party deputy mayor of Gothenburg, essentially said the same thing although it wasn’t his intended meaning.

Pilhem said he hoped the move would create more jobs, as he had seen evidence that longer shifts entailed less efficiency

Of course reducing the workday will create more jobs as workers will become less productive overall requiring additional staff to achieve the same output. That’s an essential plank in the broken window fallacy of job creation. The creation of less productive busy work always creates more jobs.

How long before President Obama adopts the Swedish model? He could do it with a stroke of his pen as he is so fond of saying.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

New Jersey student suspended for pen twirling? Thankfully, the PC police determined it wasn’t a gun

Posted by 5etester on April 8, 2014

Yet another police state school district has illustrated just how out of control the nations PC police have become.

State law and school policy mandates an investigation whenever anyone in the school feels threatened or uncomfortable with the actions of another student. This poor kid had to undergo a 5 hour psych eval. Laws and policies such as these are said to be in place to protect us but the opportunity for misuse outweighs any benefit.

Who’s to say that if I were a student, I couldn’t claim to feel threatened by the mere presence of another student? These types of policies are just a reflection of the victim mentality that pervades our society today. Taken further, it’s simply the progressives invoking collectivism more and more. In our victim society, we are all in this together and pay the price together as a collective.

Until Americans realize that their rights as individuals are squarely in the crosshairs of the progressives across a broad spectrum of our lives, we will continue to lose these battles and eventually the war.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The ideological identifier or just another progressivism tool?

Posted by 5etester on April 4, 2014

Mother Jones has published yet another hit piece on conservatives. The story is merely a reference to work being performed by John Hibbing, a political scientist at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Hibbing has created a machine that theoretically has the ability to determine whether you are a conservative or a liberal.

Mother Jones seems to go out of their way throughout the story to highlight this conclusion put forth by Hibbing.

It all adds up, according to Hibbing, to what he calls a “negativity bias” on the right. Conservatives, Hibbing’s research suggests, go through the world more attentive to negative, threatening, and disgusting stimuli—and then they adopt tough, defensive and aversive ideologies to match that perceived reality.

Yes, we conservatives are little more than a negative lot. We go through life seeking the downside to whatever is put in front of us. The question is, do the results of Hibbing’s research surprise anyone? Clearly, conservatives and liberals have vastly different ideologies. Combining our makeup derived from our psychology, biology, and politics may or may not be the best way to approach determining our ideology, but what really is the goal here? Is it to unlock the key to the Holy Grail, that being a clear methodology to convert an ideological opposite to your way of thinking?

Thomas Jefferson correctly pointed out that our ideological differences have always been there. However, is it conservatives and liberals that differ as Hibbing proposes? Our current versions of the Whigs and Tories are hardly separated by ideology. Both republicans and democrats continue to advance big government and government dependency as a way of life. Today’s liberals have completely reversed ideology since the 1960′s when they despised big government.

Political ideology is hardly the best format for identifying differences amongst us as politics are guided by a diversity of influences, many of which are driven by current events. Current events which may demand a response based upon practicality rather than ideology. Simply look at politicians who pick and choose their battles realizing they can’t win every one. Winning the war is the goal however, so taking a step back here and there may be required to keep advancing the cause.

Fact is that each and every one us started out in life as entirely dependent upon others to survive. The human race is the most susceptible of all species on the planet when we are born. We wouldn’t survive a day without human intervention. Those that carry that need for collectivism throughout their life could say they were born that way but the argument is hollow as we all were. Professor Hibbing attempts to tie our biology into our politics, but we are clearly a reflection of our surroundings and our influences. To say that everyone fits into a model of conservative or liberal ideology is folly. Some never even develop what can be construed as an ideology throughout their entire life.

So the good Professor may well be able to track a set of metrics that indeed do reflect what is considered conservative or liberal ideology as it exists today. The problem is that definition is a changing dynamic and may not apply a few years from now.

As far as conservatives being portrayed as negative leaners, that is just a viewpoint. Conserving one’s values and protecting those values from threats may well be considered a positive. Looking for aversive images and extending one’s gaze may appear to some as seeking a negative, but to others it may be considered as simply being proactive.

The bottom line is this entire thought process leads into the progressive agenda. If you’re not accepting and modifying your views and values to incorporate all opposing views and values, then you become the intolerant one. The tie-in is always made to show a conservative ideology as being one of negativity and intolerance. So it’s really no wonder at all that Mother Jones would highlight this ideological determining machine as being progressive.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 78 other followers